GW parallel strategies: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In this tutorial we will see how to setup the variables governing the parallel execution of yambo in order to perform efficient calculations in terms of both cpu time and memory to solution. As a test case we will consider the hBN 2D material. Because of its reduced dimensionality, GW calculations turns out to be very delicate. Beside the usual convergence studies with respect to k-points and sums-over-bands, in low dimensional systems a sensible amount of vacuum is required in order to treat the system as isolated, translating into a large number of plane-waves. As for other tutorials, it is important to stress that this tutorial it is meant to illustrate the functionality of the key variables and to run in reasonable time, so it has not the purpose to reach the desired accuracy to reproduce experimental results. Moreover please also note that scaling performance illustrated below may be significantly dependent on the underlying parallel architecture. Nevertheless, general considerations are tentatively drawn in discussing the results. | In this tutorial we will see how to setup the variables governing the parallel execution of yambo in order to perform efficient calculations in terms of both cpu time and memory to solution. As a test case we will consider the hBN 2D material. Because of its reduced dimensionality, GW calculations turns out to be very delicate. Beside the usual convergence studies with respect to k-points and sums-over-bands, in low dimensional systems a sensible amount of vacuum is required in order to treat the system as isolated, translating into a large number of plane-waves. As for other tutorials, it is important to stress that this tutorial it is meant to illustrate the functionality of the key variables and to run in reasonable time, so it has not the purpose to reach the desired accuracy to reproduce experimental results. Moreover please also note that scaling performance illustrated below may be significantly dependent on the underlying parallel architecture. Nevertheless, general considerations are tentatively drawn in discussing the results. | ||
== Getting familiar with yambo in parallel == | |||
If you are now inside bellatrix | If you are now inside bellatrix | ||
Line 5: | Line 7: | ||
/scratch/cecam.schoolXY/yambo_YOUR_NAME | /scratch/cecam.schoolXY/yambo_YOUR_NAME | ||
you need to obtain the appropriate tarball | you need to obtain the appropriate tarball | ||
$ cp /scratch/cecam.school/yambo_parallel/hBN-2D.tar.gz . (Notice that this time there is not XY!) | $ cp /scratch/cecam.school/yambo_parallel/hBN-2D-para.tar.gz . (Notice that this time there is not XY!) | ||
$ tar -zxvf hBN-2D.tar.gz | $ tar -zxvf hBN-2D-para.tar.gz | ||
$ ls | $ ls | ||
YAMBO_TUTORIALS | YAMBO_TUTORIALS | ||
Line 15: | Line 17: | ||
$ ls | $ ls | ||
# | |||
First run the initialization as usual. | First run the initialization as usual. | ||
Line 85: | Line 88: | ||
X_all_q_CPU= "1 1 $ncpu 1" # [PARALLEL] CPUs for each role | X_all_q_CPU= "1 1 $ncpu 1" # [PARALLEL] CPUs for each role | ||
X_all_q_ROLEs= "q k c v" # [PARALLEL] CPUs roles (q,k,c,v) | X_all_q_ROLEs= "q k c v" # [PARALLEL] CPUs roles (q,k,c,v) | ||
X_all_q_nCPU_LinAlg_INV= $ncpu # [PARALLEL] CPUs for Linear Algebra | #X_all_q_nCPU_LinAlg_INV= $ncpu # [PARALLEL] CPUs for Linear Algebra | ||
X_Threads= 0 # [OPENMP/X] Number of threads for response functions | X_Threads= 0 # [OPENMP/X] Number of threads for response functions | ||
DIP_Threads= 0 # [OPENMP/X] Number of threads for dipoles | DIP_Threads= 0 # [OPENMP/X] Number of threads for dipoles | ||
Line 104: | Line 107: | ||
As you can see, monitoring the log file produced by yambo, the run takes some time, although | As you can see, monitoring the log file produced by yambo, the run takes some time, although | ||
we are using minimal parameters. | we are using minimal parameters. | ||
== Pure MPI scaling with default parallelization scheme == | |||
Meanwhile we can run the code in parallel. Let's use 16 MPI process, still with a single thread. | Meanwhile we can run the code in parallel. Let's use 16 MPI process, still with a single thread. | ||
Line 111: | Line 116: | ||
ncpu=16 | ncpu=16 | ||
The two numbers (ncpu and tasks-per-node) must match. | |||
This time the code should be much faster. | This time the code should be much faster. | ||
Once the run is over try to run the simulation also on 2, 4, 8. | Once the run is over try to run the simulation also on 2, 4, 8. | ||
Line 116: | Line 122: | ||
At the end you can try to produce a scaling plot like the following one | At the end you can try to produce a scaling plot like the following one | ||
[[File:scaling_mpi_fermi.jpg|500px]] | [[File:scaling_mpi_fermi.jpg|500px]] | ||
Plot the execution time vs the number of MPI tasks | |||
and check (do a log plot) how far you are from the ideal linear scaling. | |||
To analyze the data you can use the phyton script which is also provided. | |||
== Advanced: Comparing different parallelization schemes (optional) == | |||
Up to now we used the default parallelization scheme. | |||
To change this you can open again the job.sh script and modify the section where the yambo input | |||
variables are set | |||
X_all_q_CPU= "1 1 $ncpu 1" # [PARALLEL] CPUs for each role | |||
X_all_q_ROLEs= "q k c v" # [PARALLEL] CPUs roles (q,k,c,v) | |||
#X_all_q_nCPU_LinAlg_INV= $ncpu # [PARALLEL] CPUs for Linear Algebra | |||
X_Threads= 0 # [OPENMP/X] Number of threads for response functions | |||
DIP_Threads= 0 # [OPENMP/X] Number of threads for dipoles | |||
SE_CPU= " 1 1 $ncpu" # [PARALLEL] CPUs for each role | |||
SE_ROLEs= "q qp b" # [PARALLEL] CPUs roles (q,qp,b) | |||
SE_Threads= 0 | |||
In particular "X_all_q_CPU" sets how the MPI Tasks are distributed in the calculation of the parallelization. | |||
The possibilities are shown in the "X_all_q_ROLEs" | |||
== Pure OpenMP scaling == | |||
Next step is instead to check the OpenMP scaling. | |||
Set back | |||
ncpu=1 | |||
and now use | |||
#SBATCH --tasks-per-node=16 | |||
export OMP_NUM_THREADS=16 | |||
As before the two numbers must match. | |||
Try setting OMP_NUM_THREADS to 16, 8, 4 and 2 and again to plot the execution time vs the number of Threads. | |||
[[File:scaling_omp_fermi.jpg|500px]] | |||
== MPI vs OpenMP scaling == | |||
Which is scaling better ? MPI or OpenMP ? |
Revision as of 16:54, 25 April 2017
In this tutorial we will see how to setup the variables governing the parallel execution of yambo in order to perform efficient calculations in terms of both cpu time and memory to solution. As a test case we will consider the hBN 2D material. Because of its reduced dimensionality, GW calculations turns out to be very delicate. Beside the usual convergence studies with respect to k-points and sums-over-bands, in low dimensional systems a sensible amount of vacuum is required in order to treat the system as isolated, translating into a large number of plane-waves. As for other tutorials, it is important to stress that this tutorial it is meant to illustrate the functionality of the key variables and to run in reasonable time, so it has not the purpose to reach the desired accuracy to reproduce experimental results. Moreover please also note that scaling performance illustrated below may be significantly dependent on the underlying parallel architecture. Nevertheless, general considerations are tentatively drawn in discussing the results.
Getting familiar with yambo in parallel
If you are now inside bellatrix
$ pwd /scratch/cecam.schoolXY/yambo_YOUR_NAME
you need to obtain the appropriate tarball
$ cp /scratch/cecam.school/yambo_parallel/hBN-2D-para.tar.gz . (Notice that this time there is not XY!) $ tar -zxvf hBN-2D-para.tar.gz $ ls YAMBO_TUTORIALS $ cd YAMBO_TUTORIALS/hBN-2D/YAMBO
To run a calculation on bellatrix you need to go via the queue system as explained in the Tutorials home. Under the YAMBO folder, together with the input file, you will see the job.sh script
$ ls #
First run the initialization as usual. Second have a look to both the input file
$ cat yambo_gw.in # # # Y88b / e e e 888~~\ ,88~-_ # Y88b / d8b d8b d8b 888 | d888 \ # Y88b/ /Y88b d888bdY88b 888 _/ 88888 | # Y8Y / Y88b / Y88Y Y888b 888 \ 88888 | # Y /____Y88b / YY Y888b 888 | Y888 / # / / Y88b / Y888b 888__/ `88_-~ # # # GPL Version 4.1.2 Revision 120 # MPI+OpenMP Build # http://www.yambo-code.org # ppa # [R Xp] Plasmon Pole Approximation gw0 # [R GW] GoWo Quasiparticle energy levels HF_and_locXC # [R XX] Hartree-Fock Self-energy and Vxc em1d # [R Xd] Dynamical Inverse Dielectric Matrix EXXRLvcs= 21817 RL # [XX] Exchange RL components Chimod= "" # [X] IP/Hartree/ALDA/LRC/BSfxc % BndsRnXp 1 | 200 | # [Xp] Polarization function bands % NGsBlkXp= 4 Ry # [Xp] Response block size % LongDrXp 1.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | # [Xp] [cc] Electric Field % PPAPntXp= 27.21138 eV # [Xp] PPA imaginary energy % GbndRnge 1 | 200 | # [GW] G[W] bands range % GDamping= 0.10000 eV # [GW] G[W] damping dScStep= 0.10000 eV # [GW] Energy step to evaluate Z factors DysSolver= "n" # [GW] Dyson Equation solver ("n","s","g") %QPkrange # [GW] QP generalized Kpoint/Band indices 1| 1| 3|6| %
and the submission script
$ cat job.sh # #!/bin/bash #SBATCH -N 1 #SBATCH -t 06:00:00 #SBATCH -J test #SBATCH --reservation=cecam_course #SBATCH --tasks-per-node=1 # module purge module load intel/16.0.3 module load intelmpi/5.1.3 # export OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 ncpu=1 # jobname="First_GW_run_np$ncpu" jdir=${jobname} cdir=${jobname}_out # filein0=yambo_gw.in filein=yambo_gw_${label}.in # cp -f $filein0 $filein cat >> $filein << EOF X_all_q_CPU= "1 1 $ncpu 1" # [PARALLEL] CPUs for each role X_all_q_ROLEs= "q k c v" # [PARALLEL] CPUs roles (q,k,c,v) #X_all_q_nCPU_LinAlg_INV= $ncpu # [PARALLEL] CPUs for Linear Algebra X_Threads= 0 # [OPENMP/X] Number of threads for response functions DIP_Threads= 0 # [OPENMP/X] Number of threads for dipoles SE_CPU= " 1 1 $ncpu" # [PARALLEL] CPUs for each role SE_ROLEs= "q qp b" # [PARALLEL] CPUs roles (q,qp,b) SE_Threads= 0 EOF # echo "Running on $ncpu MPI, $nthreads OpenMP threads" srun -n $ncpu -c $nthreads $bindir/yambo -F $filein -J $jdir -C $cdir
As soon as you are ready submit the job.
$ sbatch job.sh
Yambo calculates the GW-qp corrections running on 1 MPI process with a single thread. As you can see, monitoring the log file produced by yambo, the run takes some time, although we are using minimal parameters.
Pure MPI scaling with default parallelization scheme
Meanwhile we can run the code in parallel. Let's use 16 MPI process, still with a single thread. To this end modify the job.sh script changing
#SBATCH --tasks-per-node=16
ncpu=16
The two numbers (ncpu and tasks-per-node) must match. This time the code should be much faster. Once the run is over try to run the simulation also on 2, 4, 8. Each time please remember to change both the number of tasks per node and the number of CPUs At the end you can try to produce a scaling plot like the following one
Plot the execution time vs the number of MPI tasks and check (do a log plot) how far you are from the ideal linear scaling. To analyze the data you can use the phyton script which is also provided.
Advanced: Comparing different parallelization schemes (optional)
Up to now we used the default parallelization scheme. To change this you can open again the job.sh script and modify the section where the yambo input variables are set
X_all_q_CPU= "1 1 $ncpu 1" # [PARALLEL] CPUs for each role X_all_q_ROLEs= "q k c v" # [PARALLEL] CPUs roles (q,k,c,v) #X_all_q_nCPU_LinAlg_INV= $ncpu # [PARALLEL] CPUs for Linear Algebra X_Threads= 0 # [OPENMP/X] Number of threads for response functions DIP_Threads= 0 # [OPENMP/X] Number of threads for dipoles SE_CPU= " 1 1 $ncpu" # [PARALLEL] CPUs for each role SE_ROLEs= "q qp b" # [PARALLEL] CPUs roles (q,qp,b) SE_Threads= 0
In particular "X_all_q_CPU" sets how the MPI Tasks are distributed in the calculation of the parallelization. The possibilities are shown in the "X_all_q_ROLEs"
Pure OpenMP scaling
Next step is instead to check the OpenMP scaling. Set back
ncpu=1
and now use
#SBATCH --tasks-per-node=16 export OMP_NUM_THREADS=16
As before the two numbers must match. Try setting OMP_NUM_THREADS to 16, 8, 4 and 2 and again to plot the execution time vs the number of Threads.
MPI vs OpenMP scaling
Which is scaling better ? MPI or OpenMP ?