Talk:Main Page: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== Publications, Highlights == | == Publications, Highlights == | ||
My idea was to have a semi-static page showing selected publications on different themes, rather than a huge list of all publications. The latter can still be done and maintained e.g. via the google scholar page in some way. A highlights page instead would have groups of publications broken down into themes, like Key GW papers, Molecules, 2D, exciton distribution, high impact, etc etc. So selected papers that a new user might actually download and read. | My idea was to have a semi-static page showing selected publications on different themes, rather than a huge list of all publications. The latter can still be done and maintained e.g. via the google scholar page in some way. A highlights page instead would have groups of publications broken down into themes, like Key GW papers, Molecules, 2D, exciton distribution, high impact, etc etc. So selected papers that a new user might actually download and read. | ||
MG: OK, agree with that! I thought were highlights of latest fancy publications. Those can be done in the news |
Revision as of 22:44, 12 January 2016
MG: I would put the content of the about on top of the page (in the link you suggest it would correspond to the welcome frame for example) rather than linking to other pages. At the end of the short about text I will have some meet the developer. I agree on the model page
Structure
First draft inserted - feel free to make changes. I agree with Myrta Re: people etc
Publications, Highlights
My idea was to have a semi-static page showing selected publications on different themes, rather than a huge list of all publications. The latter can still be done and maintained e.g. via the google scholar page in some way. A highlights page instead would have groups of publications broken down into themes, like Key GW papers, Molecules, 2D, exciton distribution, high impact, etc etc. So selected papers that a new user might actually download and read. MG: OK, agree with that! I thought were highlights of latest fancy publications. Those can be done in the news