Optical properties at finite temperature: Difference between revisions

From The Yambo Project
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:High low.png|thumb|Yambo tutorial image]]
[[File:High low.png|thumb|Yambo tutorial image]]


In this tutorial we will show you how to calculate optical properties including thermal effects due to the electron-phonon coupling.
In this tutorial we will show you how to calculate optical properties including thermal effects due to the electron-phonon coupling.<br>
This tutorial assumes that you have completed all the steps from the previous tutorial on [[Electron Phonon Coupling]].
This tutorial assumes that you have completed all the steps from the previous tutorial on [[Electron Phonon Coupling]].
The tutorial is dived in different steps first we will calculate absorption at independent particle approximation, then we will include excitonic effects,
The tutorial is dived in different steps first we will calculate absorption at independent particle approximation, then we will include excitonic effects,
Line 44: Line 44:


The same procedure can be applied to the Bethe-Salpeter calculations. However in this case results can be slightly wrong. If fact electron-phonon matrix elements should be rotate in the excitonic space, as it was done in ref. <ref> see Supp. Mat. of [https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.081109 Phys. Rev. B '''99''', 081109(R) (2019)]</ref><ref>F. Paleari, [https://orbilu.uni.lu/handle/10993/41058 Phd Thesis (2019)]</ref>, while at present Yambo calculate the exciton width from the correction to the single particle bands, see ref. <ref name=marini>A. Marini, [https://arxiv.org/abs/0712.3365 Phys. Rev. Lett. '''101''' 106405 (2008)]</ref> . This approximation is correct in case of not-strong bounded excitons, and unfortunately this is not the case.
The same procedure can be applied to the Bethe-Salpeter calculations. However in this case results can be slightly wrong. If fact electron-phonon matrix elements should be rotate in the excitonic space, as it was done in ref. <ref> see Supp. Mat. of [https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.081109 Phys. Rev. B '''99''', 081109(R) (2019)]</ref><ref>F. Paleari, [https://orbilu.uni.lu/handle/10993/41058 Phd Thesis (2019)]</ref>, while at present Yambo calculate the exciton width from the correction to the single particle bands, see ref. <ref name=marini>A. Marini, [https://arxiv.org/abs/0712.3365 Phys. Rev. Lett. '''101''' 106405 (2008)]</ref> . This approximation is correct in case of not-strong bounded excitons, and unfortunately this is not the case.
 
== Bethe-Salpeter at finite temperature ==
== Excitonic Eliashberg Functions ==
== Excitonic Eliashberg Functions ==
== Phonon-assisted density of states ==
== Phonon-assisted density of states ==
== References ==
== References ==

Revision as of 17:36, 13 March 2021

Yambo tutorial image

In this tutorial we will show you how to calculate optical properties including thermal effects due to the electron-phonon coupling.
This tutorial assumes that you have completed all the steps from the previous tutorial on Electron Phonon Coupling. The tutorial is dived in different steps first we will calculate absorption at independent particle approximation, then we will include excitonic effects, and finally we will show how to analyze the data.

Absorption at finite temperature

Now you repeat the previous calculation but including all k-points, the last 3 valence and the first 3 conduction bands:

.....
%QPkrange                        # [GW] QP generalized Kpoint/Band indices
1|8|2|7|
%
....

and save the results of the 0K and 300K temperature in two separate folder with the -J option. Now you can use the correction to the energy levels and the induced width to calculate the optical absorption at finite temperature. Generate the input with the command yambo_ph -o c -V qp

optics                           # [R] Linear Response optical properties
chi                              # [R][CHI] Dyson equation for Chi.
dipoles                          # [R] Oscillator strenghts (or dipoles)
Chimod= "IP"                     # [X] IP/Hartree/ALDA/LRC/PF/BSfxc
% QpntsRXd
 1 | 1 |                             # [Xd] Transferred momenta
%
% BndsRnXd
  2 |  7 |                           # [Xd] Polarization function bands
%
% EnRngeXd
 0.000000 | 5.000000 |         eV    # [Xd] Energy range
%
% DmRngeXd
 0.0100000 | 0.0100000 |         eV    # [Xd] Damping range
%
ETStpsXd=  500                   # [Xd] Total Energy steps
% LongDrXd
 1.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 |        # [Xd] [cc] Electric Field
%
XfnQPdb= "E W < T300/ndb.QP"      # [EXTQP Xd] Database action

set the path of the ndb.QP you want to read and perform the calculations. Notice that from the QP database we read two quantities the correction to the energy levels E and the width W. In this calculation we also included a small smearing 0.01eV to mimic the electronic smearing. Hereafter the result without and with electron-phonon coupling at two different temperatures:

Absorption of bulk silicon at finite temperature

The same procedure can be applied to the Bethe-Salpeter calculations. However in this case results can be slightly wrong. If fact electron-phonon matrix elements should be rotate in the excitonic space, as it was done in ref. [1][2], while at present Yambo calculate the exciton width from the correction to the single particle bands, see ref. [3] . This approximation is correct in case of not-strong bounded excitons, and unfortunately this is not the case.

Bethe-Salpeter at finite temperature

Excitonic Eliashberg Functions

Phonon-assisted density of states

References