Real time Bethe-Salpeter Equation (TDSE): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
(67 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This tutorial will show how to perform a | ==Introduction== | ||
This tutorial will show how to perform a real-time calculation with Yambo on hBN monolayer. We will go through different approximations for the many body self--energy (HXC potential in the yambo language) up to the HSEX approximation which captures the physics of the exciton. For approximations local in space, like "TD-HARTREE" and "TD-DFT", the HXC potential can be evaluated directly during the simulation from real space quantities. On the contrary for approximations non local in space, one first need to compute the "real time collisions". | |||
The same DFT inputs used to generate the [http://media.yambo-code.eu/educational/tutorials/files/hBN-2D-RT.tar.gz hBN-2D-RT.tar.gz], are sufficient to converge the energy of the first exciton. You will need to increase the number of k-points to converge higher energy excitons. | |||
==TD Hartree and TD DFT== | |||
=== TD Hartree=== | |||
yambo_rt -n p -v hartree -F Inputs_rt/02_td_hartree.in | |||
negf # [R] Real-Time dynamics | |||
HXC_Potential= "HARTREE" # [SC] SC HXC Potential | |||
HARRLvcs= 1000 mHa # [HA] Hartree RL components | |||
VXCRLvcs= 0. mHa # [HA] DFT RL components | |||
% RTBands | |||
3 | 5 | # [RT] Bands | |||
% | |||
Integrator= "RK2" # [RT] Integrator. Use keywords space separated ( "EULER/EXPn/INV" "SIMPLE/RK2/RK4/HEUN" "RWA") | |||
PhLifeTime= 100.0000 fs # [RT] Dephasing Time | |||
RTstep=10.000000 as # [RT] Real Time step length | |||
NETime= 20.00000 fs # [RT] Simulation Time | |||
% IOtime | |||
0.01 | 1.00 | 0.01 | fs # [RT] Time between to consecutive I/O (OBSERVABLEs,CARRIERs - GF - OUTPUT) | |||
% | |||
% Field1_Freq | |||
0.00 | 0.00 | eV # [RT Field1] Frequency | |||
% | |||
Field1_Int= 1.E3 kWLm2 # [RT Field1] Intensity | |||
Field1_Width= 0.000000 fs # [RT Field1] Width | |||
Field1_kind= "DELTA" # [RT Field1] Kind(SIN|RES|ANTIRES|GAUSS|DELTA|QSSIN) | |||
Field1_pol= "linear" # [RT Field1] Pol(linear|circular) | |||
% Field1_Dir | |||
0.000000 | 1.000000 | 0.000000 | # [RT Field1] Versor | |||
% | |||
% Field1_Dir_circ | |||
0.000000 | 1.000000 | 0.000000 | # [RT Field1] Versor_circ | |||
% | |||
Field1_Tstart= 0.000000fs # [RT Field1] Initial Time | |||
We set the cut-off on the Hartree potential to 1000 mHa. This defines the cutoff used to evaluate the Hartree potential at each time step. | |||
Notice also the need of setting the cutoff to Vxc to zero. | |||
This time we will propagate for just 20 fs. It is useful to run the simulation in background and then monitor the output file | |||
nohup yambo_rt -F Inputs_rt/02_td_hartree.in -J TD-HARTREE_1000mHa -C TD-HARTREE_1000mHa & | |||
tail -f TD-HARTREE_1000mHa/o-TD-HARTREE_1000mHa.polarization | |||
We can even have check the output on the fly. | |||
To interrupt <code>tail -f </code> | |||
ctrl+C | |||
Then | |||
gnuplot | |||
plot "TD-IP_rt/o-TD-IP_rt.polarization" u 1:3 w l | |||
set xrange [0:20] | |||
rep "TD-HARTREE_1000mHa/o-TD-HARTREE_1000mHa.polarization" u 1:3 w l | |||
[[File:TD-Hartree Pol along y.png|thumb|center|900px|Time dependent polarization of hBN obtained within time depndent hartree]] | |||
We can already see from the output that the polarization is not very different from the IP one. | |||
The major difference is indeed due to the presence of a damping (or dephasing term) in the output (<code>PhLifeTime</code>, i.e. the life-time of the phase). | |||
If we check the timing of the simulation we see that most of the time is spent in the following subroutines: | |||
el_density_matrix : 7.5074 s CPU ( 4002 calls, 0.0019 s avg) | |||
V_Hartree : 1.0405 s CPU ( 4002 calls, 0.0003 s avg) | |||
V_real_space_to_H : 23.8210 s CPU ( 220220 calls, 0.0001 s avg) | |||
RT Hamiltonian : 32.5007 s CPU ( 4001 calls, 0.0081 s avg) | |||
The evaluation of the Hartree potential by itself does not take too much time. It is more consuming to evaluate the real space density. | |||
However it is the projection of the potential into the transition space (V_real_space_to_H) which takes most of the time. | |||
RT_Hamiltonian is just (roughly) the sum of the two previous subroutines. You can see how these timings change if you increase the cutoff on the Hartree potential. | |||
Thus we can expect that also the absorption will be quite similar. Indeed hBN is uniform in the plane. | |||
As previously you can now to a post-processing of the polarization. The input file is exactly the same | |||
ypp_rt -F Inputs_rt/ypp_abs.in -J TD-HARTREE_1000mHa -C TD-HARTREE_1000mHa | |||
gnuplot | |||
plot "TD-IP_rt/o-TD-IP_rt.YPP-eps_along_E" u 1:2 w l | |||
rep "TD-HARTREE_1000mHa/o-TD-HARTREE_1000mHa.YPP-eps_along_E" u 1:2 w l | |||
set xrange [2:10] | |||
rep | |||
[[File:Absorption along y.png|thumb|center|900px|hBN absorption within time dependent hartree]] | |||
The situation would be completely different if we computed the polarization out of plane at both the TD-IP and the TD-Hartree level. | |||
You can try if you wish, but remember that you have to go back to the original SAVE folder and remove the symmetries not consistent with a field along the z direction this time: | |||
(see [[Prerequisites_for_Real_Time_propagation_with_Yambo|Prerequisites]])) | |||
=== TD DFT=== | |||
You can now try to perform a TDDFT simulation. | |||
Let's use the previous input file | |||
cp Inputs_rt/02_td_hartree.in Inputs_rt/03_td_dft.in | |||
and modify it | |||
vim Input_rt/03_td_dft.in | |||
negf # [R] Real-Time dynamics | |||
HXC_Potential= "HARTREE+GS_XC" # [SC] SC HXC Potential | |||
HARRLvcs= 1.E3 mHa # [HA] Hartree RL components | |||
VXCRLvcs= 1.E3 mHa | |||
We can now run the TD-DFT simulation | |||
nohup yambo_rt -F Inputs_rt/03_td_dft.in -J TD-DFT_1000mHA -C TD-DFT_1000mHA & | |||
tail -f TD-DFT_1000mHA/o-TD-DFT_1000mHA.polarization | |||
and once it is over do the post processing | |||
ctrl+C | |||
ypp_rt_4.5_gpl -F Inputs_rt/ypp_abs.in -J TD-DFT_1000mHA -C TD-DFT_1000mHA | |||
gnuplot | |||
gnuplot> plot "TD-HARTREE_1000mHa/o-TD-HARTREE_1000mHa.YPP-eps_along_E" u 1:2 w l | |||
gnuplot> rep "TD-DFT_1000mHA/o-TD-DFT_1000mHA.YPP-eps_along_E" u 1:2 w l | |||
[[File:Absorpion hBN TDDFT.png|center|900px|thumb|Absorption of hBN in plane. Comparison between TD-HARTREE and TDDFT]] | |||
As expected TDDFT does not improve much over TD-HARTREE in extended systems | |||
==The Real Time Collisions== | |||
We next move to the evaluation of the collisions. (see [[Introduction to Real Time propagation in Yambo]] to remember what are the collisions) | |||
This part is common in between the <code>yambo_nl</code> and the <code>yambo_rt</code>. | |||
Then generate the input file to calculate the collisions (see appendix of Ref. <ref name="prb88">[https://arxiv.org/abs/1109.2424 C. Attaccalite, M. Grüning, and A. Marini PRB '''84''', 245110 (2011)]</ref>) use the command : | |||
yambo_rt -X s -e -v hsex -F Inputs/03_coll_hsex.in | |||
The flag -b will tell the code to calculate the dielectric constant that is required for the screened interaction. | |||
It could be even computed in an independent calculation and then loaded using the <code>-J</code> flags | |||
em1s # [R Xs] Static Inverse Dielectric Matrix | em1s # [R Xs] Static Inverse Dielectric Matrix | ||
dipoles # [R ] Compute the dipoles | dipoles # [R ] Compute the dipoles | ||
Chimod= "HARTREE" # [X] IP/Hartree/ALDA/LRC/PF/BSfxc | Chimod= "HARTREE" # [X] IP/Hartree/ALDA/LRC/PF/BSfxc | ||
% BndsRnXs | % BndsRnXs | ||
1 | | 1 | 20 | # [Xs] Polarization function bands | ||
% | % | ||
NGsBlkXs= <span style="color:red">1000</span> mHa # [Xs] Response block size | NGsBlkXs= <span style="color:red">1000</span> mHa # [Xs] Response block size | ||
Line 18: | Line 136: | ||
1.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | # [Xs] [cc] Electric Field | 1.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | # [Xs] [cc] Electric Field | ||
% | % | ||
% COLLBands | |||
<span style="color:red">4 | | While this is the part of the input file specific for the evaluation of the collisions | ||
collisions # [R] Eval the extended Collisions | |||
% [[Variables#COLLBands|COLLBands]] | |||
<span style="color:red">4 </span>| <span style="color:red"> 5 </span>| # [COLL] Bands for the collisions | |||
% | % | ||
HXC_Potential= "HARTREE+SEX" # [SC] SC HXC Potential | HXC_Potential= "HARTREE+SEX" # [SC] SC HXC Potential | ||
HARRLvcs= <span style="color:red">1000 </span> mHa # [HA] Hartree RL components | [[Variables#HARRLvcs|HARRLvcs]]= <span style="color:red">1000 </span>mHa # [HA] Hartree RL components | ||
EXXRLvcs= <span style="color:red">1000 </span>mHa # [XX] Exchange RL components | [[Variables#EXXRLvcs|EXXRLvcs]]= <span style="color:red">1000 </span>mHa # [XX] Exchange RL components | ||
CORRLvcs= <span style="color:red">1000 </span> mHa # [GW] Correlation RL components | [[Variables#CORRLvcs|CORRLvcs]]= <span style="color:red">1000 </span>mHa # [GW] Correlation RL components | ||
With this input, we calculate the HARTREE | With this input, we calculate the HARTREE plus SEX collisions integrals. Notice that the HARTREE term in principle can be calculated on the fly, but in this way it is more efficient especially for the non-linear response. | ||
Here one has to converge the cutoff for the Hartree and the Screened Exchange. Around <code>5000 mHa</code> is a reasonable value for hBN. In this example we will use <code>1000 mHa</code> to speed up calculations. The collisions bands <code>COLLBands</code> have to be the same number of bands you want to use in the linear/nonlinear response. | |||
The you can run | |||
yambo_rt -F Inputs/03_coll_hsex.in -J COLL_HSEX -C COLL_HSEX | |||
The calculation will take about 1 minute in serial. | |||
It produced many binary files <code>ndb.COLLISIONS_HXC_fragment_*</code> which will be needed to perform TD-HSEX simulations. | |||
Notice that, if you want, you can also compute simple HARTREE collisions and use them in a TD-HARTREE simulation. | |||
=== TD-HARTREE with collisions (facultative) === | |||
Then generate the input file to calculate the collisions (see appendix of Ref. <ref name="prb88"></ref>) use the command : | |||
yambo_rt -e -v h -F Inputs/03_coll_hartree.in | |||
with a simpler input file | |||
collisions # [R] Eval the extended Collisions | |||
% [[Variables#COLLBands|COLLBands]] | |||
<span style="color:red">4 </span> | <span style="color:red"> 5 </span> | # [COLL] Bands for the collisions | |||
% | |||
HXC_Potential= "HARTREE" # [SC] SC HXC Potential | |||
[[Variables#HARRLvcs|HARRLvcs]]= <span style="color:red">1000 </span>mHa # [HA] Hartree RL components | |||
yambo_rt -F Inputs/03_coll_hartree.in -J COLL_HARTREE -C COLL_HARTREE | |||
yambo_rt -F Inputs_rt/02_td_hartree.in -J "TD-HARTREE_COLL,COLL_HARTREE" -C TD-HARTREE_COLL | |||
and compare the run with the simulation without collision. | |||
One major difference, is that, when the collisions are used, yambo does not need to load the wave--function anymore and the simulation is much faster. | |||
The drawback is that for big systems the folder COLL_HARTREE may become huge, thus requiring a lot of disk space. | |||
==Time dependent Bethe Salpeter equation== | |||
=== Approach based on the density matrix === | |||
To generate the input for the real-time simulation you can run | |||
yambo_rt -n p -v hsex -V qp -F Inputs_rt/04_td_hsex.in | |||
As you can see this time the extra verbosity for quasi-particles is used <code>-V qp</code> | |||
The reason is that, to be consistent with the TD-HSEX, simulation we need to apply quasi-particles corrections. | |||
The input file is | |||
negf # [R] NEQ Real-time dynamics | |||
HXC_Potential= "SEX+HARTREE" # [SC] SC HXC Potential | |||
% RTBands | |||
3 | 5 | # [RT] Bands | |||
% | |||
Integrator= "RK2" # [RT] Integrator. Use keywords space separated ( "EULER/EXPn/INV" "SIMPLE/RK2/RK4/HEUN" "RWA") | |||
PhLifeTime= 100.0000 fs # [RT] Dephasing Time | |||
RTstep=10.000000 as # [RT] Real Time step length | |||
NETime= 30.00000 fs # [RT] Simulation Time | |||
% IOtime | |||
0.01 | 1.00 | 0.05 | fs # [RT] Time between to consecutive I/O (OBSERVABLEs,CARRIERs - GF - OUTPUT) | |||
% | |||
HARRLvcs= 1000 mHa # [HA] Hartree RL components | |||
EXXRLvcs= 1000 mHa # [XX] Exchange RL components | |||
CORRLvcs= 1000 mHa # [GW] Correlation RL components | |||
% GfnQP_E | |||
<span style="color:red">3.000000 </span>| 1.000000 | 1.000000 | # [EXTQP G] E parameters (c/v) eV|adim|adim | |||
% | |||
% Field1_Freq | |||
0.00 | 0.00 | eV # [RT Field1] Frequency | |||
% | |||
Field1_Int= 1.E3 kWLm2 # [RT Field1] Intensity | |||
Field1_Width= 0.000000 fs # [RT Field1] Width | |||
Field1_kind= "DELTA" # [RT Field1] Kind(SIN|RES|ANTIRES|GAUSS|DELTA|QSSIN) | |||
Field1_pol= "linear" # [RT Field1] Pol(linear|circular) | |||
% Field1_Dir | |||
0.000000 | 1.000000 | 0.000000 | # [RT Field1] Versor | |||
% | |||
% Field1_Dir_circ | |||
0.000000 | 1.000000 | 0.000000 | # [RT Field1] Versor_circ | |||
% | |||
Field1_Tstart= 0.000000fs # [RT Field1] Initial Time | |||
and then run the code. Notice the presence of the <code>COLL_SEX</code> among the options after <code>-J</code> | |||
nohup yambo_rt -F Inputs_rt/04_td_hsex.in -J "TD-SEX_rt,COLL_SEX" -C TD-SEX_rt | |||
=== Approach based on the Berry Phase === | |||
To generate the input for the real-time simulation you can run | |||
yambo_nl -u -V qp -F Inputs_nl/04_td-sex.in | |||
The input file is | |||
nloptics # [R NL] Non-linear optics | nloptics # [R NL] Non-linear optics | ||
Line 38: | Line 242: | ||
NLverbosity= "low" # [NL] Verbosity level (low | high) | NLverbosity= "low" # [NL] Verbosity level (low | high) | ||
NLstep= 0.0100 fs # [NL] Real Time step length | NLstep= 0.0100 fs # [NL] Real Time step length | ||
NLtime= | NLtime= <span style="color:red">20.00000</span> fs # [NL] Simulation Time | ||
NLintegrator= "CRANKNIC" # [NL] Integrator ("EULEREXP/RK2/RK4/RK2EXP/HEUN/INVINT/CRANKNIC") | NLintegrator= "<span style="color:red">CRANKNIC</span>" # [NL] Integrator ("EULEREXP/RK2/RK4/RK2EXP/HEUN/INVINT/CRANKNIC") | ||
NLCorrelation= "SEX" # [NL] Correlation ("IPA/HARTREE/TDDFT/LRC/LRW/JGM/SEX") | NLCorrelation= "<span style="color:red">SEX</span>" # [NL] Correlation ("IPA/HARTREE/TDDFT/LRC/LRW/JGM/SEX") | ||
NLLrcAlpha= 0.000000 # [NL] Long Range Correction | NLLrcAlpha= 0.000000 # [NL] Long Range Correction | ||
% NLEnRange | % NLEnRange | ||
0.200000 | 8.000000 | eV # [NL] Energy range | 0.200000 | 8.000000 | eV # [NL] Energy range | ||
% | % | ||
NLEnSteps= 1 | NLEnSteps= <span style="color:red">1 </span> # [NL] Energy steps | ||
NLDamping= 0.10000 eV # [NL] Damping | NLDamping= 0.10000 eV # [NL] Damping | ||
#UseDipoles # [NL] Use Covariant Dipoles (just for test purpose) | #UseDipoles # [NL] Use Covariant Dipoles (just for test purpose) | ||
#FrSndOrd # [NL] Force second order in Covariant Dipoles | #FrSndOrd # [NL] Force second order in Covariant Dipoles | ||
#EvalCurrent # [NL] Evaluate the current | #EvalCurrent # [NL] Evaluate the current | ||
HARRLvcs= | HARRLvcs= 1000 mHa # [HA] Hartree RL components | ||
EXXRLvcs= | EXXRLvcs= 1000 mHa # [XX] Exchange RL components | ||
% ExtF_Dir | % ExtF_Dir | ||
0.000000 | 1.000000 | 0.000000 | | <span style="color:red">0.000000 | 1.000000 | 0.000000 | </span> # [NL ExtF] Versor | ||
% | % | ||
ExtF_Int= 1000. kWLm2 # [NL ExtF] Intensity | ExtF_Int= 1000. kWLm2 # [NL ExtF] Intensity | ||
ExtF_Width= 0.000000 fs # [NL ExtF] Field Width | ExtF_Width= 0.000000 fs # [NL ExtF] Field Width | ||
ExtF_kind= "DELTA" # [NL ExtF] Kind(SIN|SOFTSIN|RES|ANTIRES|GAUSS|DELTA|QSSIN) | ExtF_kind= "<span style="color:red">DELTA</span>" # [NL ExtF] Kind(SIN|SOFTSIN|RES|ANTIRES|GAUSS|DELTA|QSSIN) | ||
ExtF_Tstart= 0.0100 fs # [NL ExtF] Initial Time | ExtF_Tstart= 0.0100 fs # [NL ExtF] Initial Time | ||
% GfnQP_E | % GfnQP_E | ||
3.000000 | 1.000000 | 1.000000 | # [EXTQP G] E parameters (c/v) eV|adim|adim | <span style="color:red">3.000000 </span>| 1.000000 | 1.000000 | # [EXTQP G] E parameters (c/v) eV|adim|adim | ||
% | % | ||
Notice that we introduced a scissor operator (a rigid shift of the conduction bands) of 3.0 eV. In principle, it is possible to perform a | Notice that we introduced a scissor operator (a rigid shift of the conduction bands) of 3.0 eV. In principle, it is possible to perform a G<sub>0</sub>W<sub>0</sub> calculation with Yambo and use the Quasi-particle band structure instead of the rigid shift. Run this calculation and then analyze the result in the same way of linear response tutorial, you will get a nice exciton in hBN, as the one plotted below in the old tutorial. You can repeat the same kind of calculations for the non-linear response. | ||
Notice that in the calculation we decreased the number of G-vectors in the Hartree term, | Notice that in the calculation we decreased the number of G-vectors in the Hartree term, [[Variables#HARRLvcs|HARRLvcs]] to speed up the calculation, in case of BN this does not change the result because local field effects are very small in h-BN along the plane. | ||
Now you can analyze the response with | |||
nohup yambo_nl -F Inputs_nl/04_td_hsex.in -J "TD-SEX_nl,COLL_SEX" -C TD-SEX_nl | |||
=== Final post processing === | |||
Now you can analyze the response with | |||
ypp_rt -F Inputs_rt/ypp_abs.in -J TD-sex_rt -C TD-SEX_rt | |||
ypp_nl -F Inputs_nl/ypp_abs.in -J TD-SEX_nl -C TD-SEX_nl | |||
as it was done the linear response tutorial and compare with the TD-IP run (and eventually against the standard Bethe-Salpeter): | |||
gnuplot> plot "TD-HSEX_rt/o-TD-HSEX_rt.YPP-eps_along_E" u 1:2 w l | |||
gnuplot> rep "TD-HSEX_nl/o-TD-HSEX_nl.YPP-eps_along_E" u 1:2 w l | |||
gnuplot> set xrange [3:10] | |||
gnuplot> set yrange [0:12] | |||
gnuplot> rep "TD-IP_rt/o-TD-IP_rt.YPP-eps_along_E" u ($1+3):2 w l | |||
[[File:HBN HSEX absorption.png|thumb|900px|center|In plane absorption of hBN at the TD-HSEX level compared with IP absorption]] | |||
Linear response results can be obtained following the [[How to obtain an optical spectrum|BSE tutorial]]. | |||
Notice that you can use the SEX approximation for the non-linear response too (see the following tutorials on non-linear response). | |||
==References== | |||
<references /> | |||
<br> | |||
{| style="width:100%" border="1" | |||
|style="width:15%; text-align:left"|Prev: [[Real time approach to linear response|Independent Particles ]] | |||
|style="width:70%; text-align:center"|Now: [[Tutorials|Tutorials]] --> [[Linear response from real time simulations|Linear Response]] --> [[Real time Bethe-Salpeter Equation (TDSE)]] | |||
|style="width:35%; text-align:right"|Next: If you did all steps you can go back to the previous level | |||
|- | |||
|} |
Latest revision as of 17:31, 11 September 2023
Introduction
This tutorial will show how to perform a real-time calculation with Yambo on hBN monolayer. We will go through different approximations for the many body self--energy (HXC potential in the yambo language) up to the HSEX approximation which captures the physics of the exciton. For approximations local in space, like "TD-HARTREE" and "TD-DFT", the HXC potential can be evaluated directly during the simulation from real space quantities. On the contrary for approximations non local in space, one first need to compute the "real time collisions".
The same DFT inputs used to generate the hBN-2D-RT.tar.gz, are sufficient to converge the energy of the first exciton. You will need to increase the number of k-points to converge higher energy excitons.
TD Hartree and TD DFT
TD Hartree
yambo_rt -n p -v hartree -F Inputs_rt/02_td_hartree.in
negf # [R] Real-Time dynamics HXC_Potential= "HARTREE" # [SC] SC HXC Potential HARRLvcs= 1000 mHa # [HA] Hartree RL components VXCRLvcs= 0. mHa # [HA] DFT RL components % RTBands 3 | 5 | # [RT] Bands % Integrator= "RK2" # [RT] Integrator. Use keywords space separated ( "EULER/EXPn/INV" "SIMPLE/RK2/RK4/HEUN" "RWA") PhLifeTime= 100.0000 fs # [RT] Dephasing Time RTstep=10.000000 as # [RT] Real Time step length NETime= 20.00000 fs # [RT] Simulation Time % IOtime 0.01 | 1.00 | 0.01 | fs # [RT] Time between to consecutive I/O (OBSERVABLEs,CARRIERs - GF - OUTPUT) % % Field1_Freq 0.00 | 0.00 | eV # [RT Field1] Frequency % Field1_Int= 1.E3 kWLm2 # [RT Field1] Intensity Field1_Width= 0.000000 fs # [RT Field1] Width Field1_kind= "DELTA" # [RT Field1] Kind(SIN|RES|ANTIRES|GAUSS|DELTA|QSSIN) Field1_pol= "linear" # [RT Field1] Pol(linear|circular) % Field1_Dir 0.000000 | 1.000000 | 0.000000 | # [RT Field1] Versor % % Field1_Dir_circ 0.000000 | 1.000000 | 0.000000 | # [RT Field1] Versor_circ % Field1_Tstart= 0.000000fs # [RT Field1] Initial Time
We set the cut-off on the Hartree potential to 1000 mHa. This defines the cutoff used to evaluate the Hartree potential at each time step. Notice also the need of setting the cutoff to Vxc to zero. This time we will propagate for just 20 fs. It is useful to run the simulation in background and then monitor the output file
nohup yambo_rt -F Inputs_rt/02_td_hartree.in -J TD-HARTREE_1000mHa -C TD-HARTREE_1000mHa & tail -f TD-HARTREE_1000mHa/o-TD-HARTREE_1000mHa.polarization
We can even have check the output on the fly.
To interrupt tail -f
ctrl+C
Then
gnuplot plot "TD-IP_rt/o-TD-IP_rt.polarization" u 1:3 w l set xrange [0:20] rep "TD-HARTREE_1000mHa/o-TD-HARTREE_1000mHa.polarization" u 1:3 w l
We can already see from the output that the polarization is not very different from the IP one.
The major difference is indeed due to the presence of a damping (or dephasing term) in the output (PhLifeTime
, i.e. the life-time of the phase).
If we check the timing of the simulation we see that most of the time is spent in the following subroutines:
el_density_matrix : 7.5074 s CPU ( 4002 calls, 0.0019 s avg) V_Hartree : 1.0405 s CPU ( 4002 calls, 0.0003 s avg) V_real_space_to_H : 23.8210 s CPU ( 220220 calls, 0.0001 s avg) RT Hamiltonian : 32.5007 s CPU ( 4001 calls, 0.0081 s avg)
The evaluation of the Hartree potential by itself does not take too much time. It is more consuming to evaluate the real space density. However it is the projection of the potential into the transition space (V_real_space_to_H) which takes most of the time. RT_Hamiltonian is just (roughly) the sum of the two previous subroutines. You can see how these timings change if you increase the cutoff on the Hartree potential.
Thus we can expect that also the absorption will be quite similar. Indeed hBN is uniform in the plane.
As previously you can now to a post-processing of the polarization. The input file is exactly the same
ypp_rt -F Inputs_rt/ypp_abs.in -J TD-HARTREE_1000mHa -C TD-HARTREE_1000mHa gnuplot plot "TD-IP_rt/o-TD-IP_rt.YPP-eps_along_E" u 1:2 w l rep "TD-HARTREE_1000mHa/o-TD-HARTREE_1000mHa.YPP-eps_along_E" u 1:2 w l set xrange [2:10] rep
The situation would be completely different if we computed the polarization out of plane at both the TD-IP and the TD-Hartree level. You can try if you wish, but remember that you have to go back to the original SAVE folder and remove the symmetries not consistent with a field along the z direction this time: (see Prerequisites))
TD DFT
You can now try to perform a TDDFT simulation. Let's use the previous input file
cp Inputs_rt/02_td_hartree.in Inputs_rt/03_td_dft.in
and modify it
vim Input_rt/03_td_dft.in
negf # [R] Real-Time dynamics HXC_Potential= "HARTREE+GS_XC" # [SC] SC HXC Potential HARRLvcs= 1.E3 mHa # [HA] Hartree RL components VXCRLvcs= 1.E3 mHa
We can now run the TD-DFT simulation
nohup yambo_rt -F Inputs_rt/03_td_dft.in -J TD-DFT_1000mHA -C TD-DFT_1000mHA & tail -f TD-DFT_1000mHA/o-TD-DFT_1000mHA.polarization
and once it is over do the post processing
ctrl+C ypp_rt_4.5_gpl -F Inputs_rt/ypp_abs.in -J TD-DFT_1000mHA -C TD-DFT_1000mHA gnuplot gnuplot> plot "TD-HARTREE_1000mHa/o-TD-HARTREE_1000mHa.YPP-eps_along_E" u 1:2 w l gnuplot> rep "TD-DFT_1000mHA/o-TD-DFT_1000mHA.YPP-eps_along_E" u 1:2 w l
As expected TDDFT does not improve much over TD-HARTREE in extended systems
The Real Time Collisions
We next move to the evaluation of the collisions. (see Introduction to Real Time propagation in Yambo to remember what are the collisions)
This part is common in between the yambo_nl
and the yambo_rt
.
Then generate the input file to calculate the collisions (see appendix of Ref. [1]) use the command :
yambo_rt -X s -e -v hsex -F Inputs/03_coll_hsex.in
The flag -b will tell the code to calculate the dielectric constant that is required for the screened interaction.
It could be even computed in an independent calculation and then loaded using the -J
flags
em1s # [R Xs] Static Inverse Dielectric Matrix
dipoles # [R ] Compute the dipoles
Chimod= "HARTREE" # [X] IP/Hartree/ALDA/LRC/PF/BSfxc
% BndsRnXs
1 | 20 | # [Xs] Polarization function bands
%
NGsBlkXs= 1000 mHa # [Xs] Response block size
% DmRngeXs
0.10000 | 0.10000 | eV # [Xs] Damping range
%
% LongDrXs
1.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | # [Xs] [cc] Electric Field
%
While this is the part of the input file specific for the evaluation of the collisions
collisions # [R] Eval the extended Collisions % COLLBands 4 | 5 | # [COLL] Bands for the collisions % HXC_Potential= "HARTREE+SEX" # [SC] SC HXC Potential HARRLvcs= 1000 mHa # [HA] Hartree RL components EXXRLvcs= 1000 mHa # [XX] Exchange RL components CORRLvcs= 1000 mHa # [GW] Correlation RL components
With this input, we calculate the HARTREE plus SEX collisions integrals. Notice that the HARTREE term in principle can be calculated on the fly, but in this way it is more efficient especially for the non-linear response.
Here one has to converge the cutoff for the Hartree and the Screened Exchange. Around 5000 mHa
is a reasonable value for hBN. In this example we will use 1000 mHa
to speed up calculations. The collisions bands COLLBands
have to be the same number of bands you want to use in the linear/nonlinear response.
The you can run
yambo_rt -F Inputs/03_coll_hsex.in -J COLL_HSEX -C COLL_HSEX
The calculation will take about 1 minute in serial.
It produced many binary files ndb.COLLISIONS_HXC_fragment_*
which will be needed to perform TD-HSEX simulations.
Notice that, if you want, you can also compute simple HARTREE collisions and use them in a TD-HARTREE simulation.
TD-HARTREE with collisions (facultative)
Then generate the input file to calculate the collisions (see appendix of Ref. [1]) use the command :
yambo_rt -e -v h -F Inputs/03_coll_hartree.in
with a simpler input file
collisions # [R] Eval the extended Collisions % COLLBands 4 | 5 | # [COLL] Bands for the collisions % HXC_Potential= "HARTREE" # [SC] SC HXC Potential HARRLvcs= 1000 mHa # [HA] Hartree RL components
yambo_rt -F Inputs/03_coll_hartree.in -J COLL_HARTREE -C COLL_HARTREE yambo_rt -F Inputs_rt/02_td_hartree.in -J "TD-HARTREE_COLL,COLL_HARTREE" -C TD-HARTREE_COLL
and compare the run with the simulation without collision. One major difference, is that, when the collisions are used, yambo does not need to load the wave--function anymore and the simulation is much faster. The drawback is that for big systems the folder COLL_HARTREE may become huge, thus requiring a lot of disk space.
Time dependent Bethe Salpeter equation
Approach based on the density matrix
To generate the input for the real-time simulation you can run
yambo_rt -n p -v hsex -V qp -F Inputs_rt/04_td_hsex.in
As you can see this time the extra verbosity for quasi-particles is used -V qp
The reason is that, to be consistent with the TD-HSEX, simulation we need to apply quasi-particles corrections.
The input file is
negf # [R] NEQ Real-time dynamics HXC_Potential= "SEX+HARTREE" # [SC] SC HXC Potential % RTBands 3 | 5 | # [RT] Bands % Integrator= "RK2" # [RT] Integrator. Use keywords space separated ( "EULER/EXPn/INV" "SIMPLE/RK2/RK4/HEUN" "RWA") PhLifeTime= 100.0000 fs # [RT] Dephasing Time RTstep=10.000000 as # [RT] Real Time step length NETime= 30.00000 fs # [RT] Simulation Time % IOtime 0.01 | 1.00 | 0.05 | fs # [RT] Time between to consecutive I/O (OBSERVABLEs,CARRIERs - GF - OUTPUT) % HARRLvcs= 1000 mHa # [HA] Hartree RL components EXXRLvcs= 1000 mHa # [XX] Exchange RL components CORRLvcs= 1000 mHa # [GW] Correlation RL components
% GfnQP_E
3.000000 | 1.000000 | 1.000000 | # [EXTQP G] E parameters (c/v) eV|adim|adim
%
% Field1_Freq 0.00 | 0.00 | eV # [RT Field1] Frequency % Field1_Int= 1.E3 kWLm2 # [RT Field1] Intensity Field1_Width= 0.000000 fs # [RT Field1] Width Field1_kind= "DELTA" # [RT Field1] Kind(SIN|RES|ANTIRES|GAUSS|DELTA|QSSIN) Field1_pol= "linear" # [RT Field1] Pol(linear|circular) % Field1_Dir 0.000000 | 1.000000 | 0.000000 | # [RT Field1] Versor % % Field1_Dir_circ 0.000000 | 1.000000 | 0.000000 | # [RT Field1] Versor_circ % Field1_Tstart= 0.000000fs # [RT Field1] Initial Time
and then run the code. Notice the presence of the COLL_SEX
among the options after -J
nohup yambo_rt -F Inputs_rt/04_td_hsex.in -J "TD-SEX_rt,COLL_SEX" -C TD-SEX_rt
Approach based on the Berry Phase
To generate the input for the real-time simulation you can run
yambo_nl -u -V qp -F Inputs_nl/04_td-sex.in
The input file is
nloptics # [R NL] Non-linear optics DIP_Threads=0 # [OPENMP/X] Number of threads for dipoles NL_Threads=0 # [OPENMP/NL] Number of threads for nl-optics % NLBands 4 | 5 | # [NL] Bands % NLverbosity= "low" # [NL] Verbosity level (low | high) NLstep= 0.0100 fs # [NL] Real Time step length NLtime= 20.00000 fs # [NL] Simulation Time NLintegrator= "CRANKNIC" # [NL] Integrator ("EULEREXP/RK2/RK4/RK2EXP/HEUN/INVINT/CRANKNIC") NLCorrelation= "SEX" # [NL] Correlation ("IPA/HARTREE/TDDFT/LRC/LRW/JGM/SEX") NLLrcAlpha= 0.000000 # [NL] Long Range Correction % NLEnRange 0.200000 | 8.000000 | eV # [NL] Energy range % NLEnSteps= 1 # [NL] Energy steps NLDamping= 0.10000 eV # [NL] Damping #UseDipoles # [NL] Use Covariant Dipoles (just for test purpose) #FrSndOrd # [NL] Force second order in Covariant Dipoles #EvalCurrent # [NL] Evaluate the current HARRLvcs= 1000 mHa # [HA] Hartree RL components EXXRLvcs= 1000 mHa # [XX] Exchange RL components % ExtF_Dir 0.000000 | 1.000000 | 0.000000 | # [NL ExtF] Versor % ExtF_Int= 1000. kWLm2 # [NL ExtF] Intensity ExtF_Width= 0.000000 fs # [NL ExtF] Field Width ExtF_kind= "DELTA" # [NL ExtF] Kind(SIN|SOFTSIN|RES|ANTIRES|GAUSS|DELTA|QSSIN) ExtF_Tstart= 0.0100 fs # [NL ExtF] Initial Time % GfnQP_E 3.000000 | 1.000000 | 1.000000 | # [EXTQP G] E parameters (c/v) eV|adim|adim %
Notice that we introduced a scissor operator (a rigid shift of the conduction bands) of 3.0 eV. In principle, it is possible to perform a G0W0 calculation with Yambo and use the Quasi-particle band structure instead of the rigid shift. Run this calculation and then analyze the result in the same way of linear response tutorial, you will get a nice exciton in hBN, as the one plotted below in the old tutorial. You can repeat the same kind of calculations for the non-linear response. Notice that in the calculation we decreased the number of G-vectors in the Hartree term, HARRLvcs to speed up the calculation, in case of BN this does not change the result because local field effects are very small in h-BN along the plane.
nohup yambo_nl -F Inputs_nl/04_td_hsex.in -J "TD-SEX_nl,COLL_SEX" -C TD-SEX_nl
Final post processing
Now you can analyze the response with
ypp_rt -F Inputs_rt/ypp_abs.in -J TD-sex_rt -C TD-SEX_rt ypp_nl -F Inputs_nl/ypp_abs.in -J TD-SEX_nl -C TD-SEX_nl
as it was done the linear response tutorial and compare with the TD-IP run (and eventually against the standard Bethe-Salpeter):
gnuplot> plot "TD-HSEX_rt/o-TD-HSEX_rt.YPP-eps_along_E" u 1:2 w l gnuplot> rep "TD-HSEX_nl/o-TD-HSEX_nl.YPP-eps_along_E" u 1:2 w l gnuplot> set xrange [3:10] gnuplot> set yrange [0:12] gnuplot> rep "TD-IP_rt/o-TD-IP_rt.YPP-eps_along_E" u ($1+3):2 w l
Linear response results can be obtained following the BSE tutorial. Notice that you can use the SEX approximation for the non-linear response too (see the following tutorials on non-linear response).
References
Prev: Independent Particles | Now: Tutorials --> Linear Response --> Real time Bethe-Salpeter Equation (TDSE) | Next: If you did all steps you can go back to the previous level |