Real time approach to linear response: Difference between revisions

From The Yambo Project
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created intro on IP absorption)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Introduction ==


In this example, we will consider a single layer of hexagonal boron nitride (hBN).
In this example, we will consider a single layer of hexagonal boron nitride (hBN).
If you didn't before you can download input files and Yambo databases for this tutorial here: [http://www.yambo-code.org/educational/tutorials/files/hBN-2D-RT.tar.gz hBN-2D-RT.tar.gz].
If you didn't before you can download input files and Yambo databases for this tutorial here: [http://www.yambo-code.org/educational/tutorials/files/hBN-2D-RT.tar.gz hBN-2D-RT.tar.gz].
and/or follow the instructions to generate the databases here: [[Prerequisites for Real Time propagation with Yambo]]
and/or follow the instructions to generate the databases here: [[Prerequisites for Real Time propagation with Yambo]]
Before proceeding with the real-time simulations it is useful to compute the Independent Particles (IP) absorption spectrum of hBN along the y direction.
If you didn't before you can create the input file with the command
yambo -o c -F 01_ip.in
and set the proper input parameters
  optics                        # [R OPT] Optics
  chi                            # [R CHI] Dyson equation for Chi.
  dipoles                        # [R  ] Compute the dipoles
  Chimod= "IP"                  # [X] IP/Hartree/ALDA/LRC/PF/BSfxc
  % QpntsRXd
    1 |  1 |                  # [Xd] Transferred momenta
  %
  % BndsRnXd
    3 | 6 |                    # [Xd] Polarization function bands
  %
  % EnRngeXd
    0.00000 | 20.00000 | eV      # [Xd] Energy range
  %
  % DmRngeXd
    0.10000 |  0.10000 | eV      # [Xd] Damping range
  %
  ETStpsXd= 2001                  # [Xd] Total Energy steps
  % LongDrXd
  0.000000 | 1.000000 | 0.000000 |        # [Xd] [cc] Electric Field
  %
and then run the code
yambo -F 01_ip.in -J CHI_IP -C CHI_IP
The resulting spectrum will give an idea of the energy involved in the real-time simulations
gnuplot
plot "CHI_IP/o-CHI_IP.eps_q1_ip" u 1:2 w l
[[File:Independent Particles absorption for hBN.png|center|600px|Independent Particles absorptions for hBN comuting using 4 bands and with LDA eigenvalues]]


==Real-time dynamics at the independent particles level ==
==Real-time dynamics at the independent particles level ==
Line 66: Line 100:
  gnuplot
  gnuplot
  plot "TD-IP_rt/o-TD-IP_rt.polarization" u 1:3 w l
  plot "TD-IP_rt/o-TD-IP_rt.polarization" u 1:3 w l
[[File:IP Polarization along y direction.png|thumb|600px|Time dependent polarization generated with a TD-IP run using yambo_rt]]
The polarization is oscillating very quickly and with the time step for the output file we have chosen (100 as) we can hardly resolve the oscillations. Indeed the slowest oscillation is expected at the first absorption peak, which is located slightly above 4 eV. This corresponds to a period of


The I/O time, which is negligible in such calculations, is less optimized and becomes the most time demanding step here.
The I/O time, which is negligible in such calculations, is less optimized and becomes the most time demanding step here.
Line 71: Line 107:
   RT databases IO :    6.8745 s CPU (    5501 calls,    0.0012 s avg)
   RT databases IO :    6.8745 s CPU (    5501 calls,    0.0012 s avg)


Finally we can proceed to the Fourier transform of the polarization to obtain the dielectric function


=== Approach based on the Berry Phase  ===
=== Approach based on the Berry Phase  ===
Line 103: Line 138:
We set the differential equation integrator to <code>INVINT</code> that is faster but less accurate than the default (see Ref. <ref name="Attaccalite2013">C. Attaccalite and M. Gruning [https://arxiv.org/abs/1309.4012v2 Rev. B, '''88''', 235113 (2013)]</ref>) . This integrator is ok in case of independent particles but I advise you to use <code>CRANKNIC</code> integrator when correlation effects are present. Now run <code>yambo_nl -F input_lr.in</code>
We set the differential equation integrator to <code>INVINT</code> that is faster but less accurate than the default (see Ref. <ref name="Attaccalite2013">C. Attaccalite and M. Gruning [https://arxiv.org/abs/1309.4012v2 Rev. B, '''88''', 235113 (2013)]</ref>) . This integrator is ok in case of independent particles but I advise you to use <code>CRANKNIC</code> integrator when correlation effects are present. Now run <code>yambo_nl -F input_lr.in</code>
The code will produce different files: <code>o.polarization_F1</code> that contains the polarization, o.external_potential_F1 the external field we used, and finally r_optics_nloptics a report with all information about the simulation. If you plot the third column of <code>o.polarization_F1</code> versus the first one (time-variable) you will get the time-dependent polarization along the y-direction:
The code will produce different files: <code>o.polarization_F1</code> that contains the polarization, o.external_potential_F1 the external field we used, and finally r_optics_nloptics a report with all information about the simulation. If you plot the third column of <code>o.polarization_F1</code> versus the first one (time-variable) you will get the time-dependent polarization along the y-direction:


[[File:Bn polarization.png|center|600px|Real-time polarization in the y-direction]]
[[File:Bn polarization.png|center|600px|Real-time polarization in the y-direction]]


==Results Analysis==
==Results Analysis==
We can now proceed to the Fourier transform of the polarization to obtain the dielectric function
=== Approach based on the density matrix ===
=== Approach based on the Berry Phase  ===


Now we can use ypp_nl -u to analyze the results:
Now we can use ypp_nl -u to analyze the results:

Revision as of 15:38, 20 January 2020

Introduction

In this example, we will consider a single layer of hexagonal boron nitride (hBN). If you didn't before you can download input files and Yambo databases for this tutorial here: hBN-2D-RT.tar.gz. and/or follow the instructions to generate the databases here: Prerequisites for Real Time propagation with Yambo

Before proceeding with the real-time simulations it is useful to compute the Independent Particles (IP) absorption spectrum of hBN along the y direction. If you didn't before you can create the input file with the command

yambo -o c -F 01_ip.in

and set the proper input parameters

 optics                         # [R OPT] Optics
 chi                            # [R CHI] Dyson equation for Chi.
 dipoles                        # [R   ] Compute the dipoles
 Chimod= "IP"                   # [X] IP/Hartree/ALDA/LRC/PF/BSfxc
 % QpntsRXd
    1 |  1 |                   # [Xd] Transferred momenta
 %
 % BndsRnXd
   3 | 6 |                     # [Xd] Polarization function bands
 %
 % EnRngeXd
   0.00000 | 20.00000 | eV      # [Xd] Energy range
 %
 % DmRngeXd
   0.10000 |  0.10000 | eV      # [Xd] Damping range
 %
 ETStpsXd= 2001                  # [Xd] Total Energy steps
 % LongDrXd
  0.000000 | 1.000000 | 0.000000 |        # [Xd] [cc] Electric Field
 %

and then run the code

yambo -F 01_ip.in -J CHI_IP -C CHI_IP

The resulting spectrum will give an idea of the energy involved in the real-time simulations

gnuplot
plot "CHI_IP/o-CHI_IP.eps_q1_ip" u 1:2 w l
Independent Particles absorptions for hBN comuting using 4 bands and with LDA eigenvalues


Real-time dynamics at the independent particles level

Since we work with the two independent approaches coded in yambo it will be useful to create two different folders for the input files.

mkdir Inputs_rt
mkdir Inputs_nl

In order to calculate linear-response in real-time, we will perturb the system with a delta function in time external field.

Approach based on the density matrix

Use the command yambo_rt -p p -F Inputs_rt/01_td_ip.in to generate the input:

 negf                           # [R] Real-Time dynamics
 RT_Threads=0                   # [OPENMP/RT] Number of threads for real-time
 HXC_Potential= "IP"           # [SC] SC HXC Potential
 % RTBands
   3 |  6 |                     # [RT] Bands
 %
 Integrator= "EULER RK2"              # [RT] Integrator. Use keywords space separated  ( "EULER/EXPn/INV" "SIMPLE/RK2/RK4/HEUN" "RWA")
 PhLifeTime= 0.000000   fs      # [RT] Dephasing Time
 RTstep=10.000000       as      # [RT] Real Time step length
 NETime= 55.00000       fs      # [RT] Simulation Time
 % IOtime
  0.05     | 5.00     | 0.10     |  fs    # [RT] Time between to consecutive I/O (OBSERVABLEs,CARRIERs - GF - OUTPUT)
 %
 % Field1_Freq
  0.00     | 0.00     | eV      # [RT Field1] Frequency
 %
 Field1_Int=1.E3   kWLm2   # [RT Field1] Intensity
 Field1_Width= 0.000000 fs      # [RT Field1] Width
 Field1_kind= "DELTA"           # [RT Field1] Kind(SIN|RES|ANTIRES|GAUSS|DELTA|QSSIN)
 Field1_pol= "linear"           # [RT Field1] Pol(linear|circular)
 % Field1_Dir
  0.000000 | 1.000000 | 0.000000 |        # [RT Field1] Versor
 %
 % Field1_Dir_circ
  0.000000 | 1.000000 | 0.000000 |        # [RT Field1] Versor_circ
 %
 Field1_Tstart= 0.000000fs      # [RT Field1] Initial Time

Set the field direction along y, the field type to DELTA, the length of the simulation to 55 fs, number of bands from 3 to 6, dephasing to zero and the field intensity to 1.E3 [kW/cm2]. A small intensity is needed to ensure that we remain in the perturbative regime and that the response is dominated by linear term. The yambo_rt is optimized for TD-SEX (or even more sophisticated calculations).

Now run the simulation: yambo_rt -F Inputs_rt/01_td_ip.in -J TD-IP_rt -C TD-IP_rt. The run produces, besides the standard report and (eventually) log files of yambo, 3 output files:

 TD-IP_rt/01_td_ip.in_TD-IP_rt
 TD-IP_rt/r-TD-IP_rt_negf
 TD-IP_rt/o-TD-IP_rt.polarization
 TD-IP_rt/o-TD-IP_rt.external_field
 TD-IP_rt/o-TD-IP_rt.current

Moreover it also makes a copy of the input file. If the run is taking to long you can open the copy of the input file TD-IP_rt/01_td_ip.in_TD-IP_rt and add there the string

STOP_NOW

It will finish the simulation in a proper way.

You can now plot the resulting time-dependent polarization and obtain something like this

gnuplot
plot "TD-IP_rt/o-TD-IP_rt.polarization" u 1:3 w l
Time dependent polarization generated with a TD-IP run using yambo_rt

The polarization is oscillating very quickly and with the time step for the output file we have chosen (100 as) we can hardly resolve the oscillations. Indeed the slowest oscillation is expected at the first absorption peak, which is located slightly above 4 eV. This corresponds to a period of

The I/O time, which is negligible in such calculations, is less optimized and becomes the most time demanding step here. We can overcome this setting the IOtime for the polarization to 50 as (i.e. each 5 time steps). After the run you can have a look at the timing report and you will see that indeed most of the timing was spent in the I/O:

 RT databases IO :    6.8745 s CPU (    5501 calls,    0.0012 s avg)


Approach based on the Berry Phase

Use the command yambo_nl -u -F input_lr.in to generate the input:

nlinear                      # [R NL] Non-linear optics
NL_Threads= 1                # [OPENMP/NL] Number of threads for nl-optics
% NLBands
  3 |  6 |                   # [NL] Bands
%
NLstep=   0.0100       fs    # [NL] Real Time step length
NLtime=55.000000      fs    # [NL] Simulation Time
NLverbosity= "high"           # [NL] Verbosity level (low | high)
NLintegrator= "INVINT"       # [NL] Integrator ("EULEREXP/RK4/RK2EXP/HEUN/INVINT/CRANKNIC")
NLCorrelation= "IPA"         # [NL] Correlation ("IPA/HARTREE/TDDFT/LRC/JGM/SEX/HF")
NLLrcAlpha= 0.000000         # [NL] Long Range Correction
% NLEnRange
 0.200000 | 8.000000 | eV    # [NL] Energy range 
%
NLEnSteps= 1                 # [NL] Energy steps
NLDamping= 0.000000    eV    # [NL] Damping
% ExtF_Dir
 0.000000 | 1.000000  | 0.000000 |        # [NL ExtF] Versor
%
ExtF_kind=  "DELTA"          # [NL ExtF] Kind(SIN|SOFTSIN|RES|ANTIRES|GAUSS|DELTA|QSSIN)


The standard input of yambo_nl is thought for the non-linear response so we have to change some parameters in order to calculate the linear response. Set the field direction along y, the field type to DELTA, the length of the simulation to 55 fs, number of bands from 3 to 6 dephasing to zero and the number of energy steps to one, as shown above in red. We set the verbosity to "high" in such a way to print real-time output files. We set the differential equation integrator to INVINT that is faster but less accurate than the default (see Ref. [1]) . This integrator is ok in case of independent particles but I advise you to use CRANKNIC integrator when correlation effects are present. Now run yambo_nl -F input_lr.in The code will produce different files: o.polarization_F1 that contains the polarization, o.external_potential_F1 the external field we used, and finally r_optics_nloptics a report with all information about the simulation. If you plot the third column of o.polarization_F1 versus the first one (time-variable) you will get the time-dependent polarization along the y-direction:

Real-time polarization in the y-direction

Results Analysis

We can now proceed to the Fourier transform of the polarization to obtain the dielectric function

Approach based on the density matrix

Approach based on the Berry Phase

Now we can use ypp_nl -u to analyze the results:

nonlinear                    # [R] NonLinear Optics Post-Processing
Xorder= 1                    # Max order of the response functions
% TimeRange
-1.000000 |-1.000000 | fs    # Time-window where processing is done
%
ETStpsRt= 1001                # Total Energy steps
% EnRngeRt
  0.00000 | 10.00000 | eV    # Energy range
%
DampMode= "LORENTZIAN"             # Damping type ( NONE | LORENTZIAN | GAUSSIAN )
DampFactor=  0.10000   eV    # Damping parameter


where we set a Lorentzian smearing corresponding to 0.1 eV. Notice that due to the finite time of our simulation smearing is always necessary to Fourier transform the result. Then we run ypp_nl and obtain the following files: the dielectric constant along with the field direction o.YPP-eps_along_E, the EELS along with the same direction o.YPP-eels_along_E, and the damped polarization o.YPP-damped_polarization. Now we can plot the dielectric constant and compare it with the linear response:

Imaginary part of the dielectric constant

The input for the linear response can be downloaded here.

  1. C. Attaccalite and M. Gruning Rev. B, 88, 235113 (2013)